Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kitepublishing.com

The Kite Book | Thekite · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
thebookvortex.com
The Book Vortex
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
the50thlaw.com
The 50th Law Book | the50thlaw.com
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
the4thbomb.com
The 4th Bomb | The Book That Shook MI5
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
thebookgrowers.com
The Book Growers
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
thealmondtreebook.com
The Almond Tree Book | Home
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
thebookgawker.com
The Book Gawker
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
thebookhope.com
Hope The Book
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
evilsorigin.com
Evil's Origin | The book...
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
theafternoonbookclub.com
Home | The Afternoon Book Club
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
betteursini.com
Bette Ursini | The book - Living the Dream
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
thebookofvoices.com
The Book of Voices
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
theboombookclub.com
The Boom Book Club
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
everywherebookseries.com
The Everywhere Book Series
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
thebookishfay.com
Home - The Bookish Fay
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kieronlauder.com
Imps - The Book By Kieron Lauder
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
kingairbook.com
The King Air Book | The King Air Book Volume II By Tom Clements
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
thebookofloretta.com
The Book of Loretta
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
amynovoa.com
Thriller Book | Amy Novoa
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.