Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to kitabooks.com

KitaBooks - Homepage · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
antonkoberger.com
Books -
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
decursus.com
Decursus Homepage
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
70match
indexhaus.com
indexHAUS - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
69match
nnixpublications.com
NNix Publications - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
need-solutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
NEED Solutions - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
gradyeditorialservices.com
Grady Editorial Services - Indexing and Proofreading - Homepage
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
finelink.com
Fineline - Home Page
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
flexmindstudio.com
Homepage - My Blog
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
liderbooks.com
Lider Books EN
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
68match
nmg-dev.com
Homepage - NMG Dev
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
67match
indie-to-indie.com
Indie-to-Indie - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
mediationpublishing.com
Homepage - mediation-publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
jenniferstair.com
Jennifer Stair - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
maydaystudio.com
may day studio - home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
amzpubl.com
AMZ Publisher - Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
index-s.com
INDEX-S - INDEX-S Home
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
nixsonbooks.com
Nixson Books
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
66match
quratebooks.com
QurateBooks - Global Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.