Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kirmoos.com

Kirill Moosienko — Industrial Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
6floral.com
Sky Cheng — Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
annu.me
Annuai | Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
makeremcakir.com
M. A. Kerem Çakır - Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
nageldesignlab.com
Alex Nagel — Industrial Designer, Victoria BC
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
manonlesant.com
Manon Le Sant - industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
natalieschaake.com
Natalie Schaake • Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
design-um.com
DesignUM - Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
demetbilici.com
Demet Bilici | Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
gmuzz.com
Griffin Muzzarelli – Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
manudelater.com
Manu Delater - Freelance Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
designviitasalo.com
Design Viitasalo — Industrial Design & Brand Identity
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
betadesignoffice.com
Home | Beta Design Office | London Industrial Designers
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
designresolute.com
Eli Hooper // Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
derelshell.com
Derel Shell - Industrial Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
tgdesignstudio.com
Tiger Chong Sheng Guo | Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
chinghoportfolio.com
Industrial Design Solutions | Ching Ho
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
nahuelvillar.com
Nahuel Villar. Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
goldsteinindustrial.com
design thinking & industrial design solutions
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.