Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kiril.dev

Web Segmentation Survey · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
demonbell.com
Web Design & AI Implementation, AI/UX
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
renan-web.com
Web Création Renan
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
elevationsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Elevation Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
advancedcomputationsolution.com
Advanced Computation Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
goingtoplay.com
Web Creations
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
revealjs.com
The HTML presentation framework | reveal.js
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
dotstudio.co.uk 🇬🇧
Web development, Multimedia presentations | dotStudio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
tgnwebsitesurvey.com
Website Discovery Survey
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
aichabarry.info
Barry's Demonstration Site
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
sowebservices.co.uk 🇬🇧
SO Web Services
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
sjkwebservices.com
SJK Web Services
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
7hubwebsolution.com
7Hub Web Solution
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
2onwebsolutions.com
2 On Web Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
andeswebsolutions.com
Andes Web Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
globlewebsolution.com
Globle Web Solution
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
kikibo.com
GUNTER GEYER / Web Application Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
terrawebs.com
Terra Web Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
nationtechnology.co.uk 🇬🇧
Web Design Leamington Spa Nation Technology
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.