Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kintexta.com

Kintexta Technologies · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
skatechnologies.com
SKA Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
a3etech.com
A3ETechnologies Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
glimstech.com
Glims Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
alzio.tech
Alzio Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
imansofttechnologies.com
IMANSOFT TECHNOLOGIES
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
sinuvera.com
Sinuvera Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
amsol.biz
.. AMSOL Technologies ..
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
3a-technology.com
3A Technology
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
5thorder.com
FifthOrder Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
andromeda-technologies.com
Andromeda Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
nakhyatra.com
Nakhyatra Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
biitechnologies.com
Bii Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
ilgtechnologies.com
ILG Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
ilgadmissions.com
ILG Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
pdm-tech.com
PDM Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
skymarktechnologies.com
Skymark Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
amnuz.org
Amnuz Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
amnuz.com
Amnuz Technologies
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.