Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kinnersley.com

Kinnersley Software Limited · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
fy7softwarelimited.co.uk 🇬🇧
FY7 Software Limited
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
ackeeandsoftware.com
Ackee & Software Limited
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
hhpsoftware.in 🇮🇳
HHP SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
btcisoftware.com
BTCI Software Private Limited
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
activitybooking.app
Home - Jack Joynson Software Limited
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
neosoftware.uk 🇬🇧
neosoftware limited | website 2024
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
4beats.net
4Beats Limited – Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
fumoi.com
Fumoi Limited - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
shawsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Shaw Software Ltd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
fooblesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Fooble Software Ltd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
redvalley-software.com
Red Valley Software GmbH - Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
jksoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
JK Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
8queens.com
8Queens Software Technologies Private Limited 2026
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
eeasoftware.com
EEA Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
lrasoftware.com
LRA Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
muksoftware.com
MUK Software
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
the-software.dev
the Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
clrsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
CLR Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.