similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kindnessandscience.org

Kindnessandscience alternatives & similar sites

Kindness and Science – Working together or as educated individuals we can affect change. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
astrobonology.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bonnie Teece – Astrobiologist and Science Communicator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neglectedscience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Neglected Science – Expanding the Horizons of Science	en	science WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mysciencewalks.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	MY SCIENCE WALKS - Vassilios Spathopoulos, educator and author	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pruefrancis.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Prue Francis – Marine scientist and educator	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
evangelist.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Open Science Evangelist – News and Stories from GaudiLabs	Switzerland en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4loveandscience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	4Love and Science - 4Love+Science	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intraindividual.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Intraindividual – Quantitative Modeling of Repeated Observations from Individuals & Groups	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myfusimotors.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Scents of Science – Think different.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cballen.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cballen – Science and Technology Guild	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neelkanthamukherjee.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Life, Maths and Science \| Neelkantha Mukherjee's Blog	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nesciences.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NESciences – Natural and Engineering Sciences	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amse.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	American Museum of Science and Energy – Inspire the Imagination	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ncas-m.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NCAS-M – NOAA Center for Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intalksicology.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	intalksicology – Communicating science like we're talking to real people (because we are!!)	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
naturefacts.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Nature Facts - Get the Facts and Information about Nature and Science \| NatureFacts.net	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casualsci.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Casual Science – Cutting Edge Research… Straight from the Horse's Mouth	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
negasciencesymposium.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	NEGA Science Symposium – Exploring truth in science – annual festival for NE Georgia	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zbw-mediatalk.eu ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ZBW MediaTalk \| Open Science und Science Policy	European Union en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.