Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kimweber.dev

Kim Weber — Web Developer in Nanaimo, BC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
killianhoa.com
HK — Web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
devinimbesi.com
Devin Imbesi | Web Developer in NYC
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
devincomputer.com
Devin Imbesi | Web Developer in NYC
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
imbesi.dev
Devin Imbesi | Web Developer in NYC
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
imbesiweb.com
Devin Imbesi | Web Developer in NYC
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
nadel.dev
nadel.dev — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
alangportfolio.org
Alan Guerrier – Freelance Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
andiwp.com
AndiWP — Web Developer - Laravel
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
andrewrapier.com
Andrew Rapier — Web Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
rendyjaya.com
Rendy Jaya — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
evalallemand.com
Eva Lallemand — web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
sitescalepros.com
Site Scale Pros — Web Development Agency
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
kfickle.com
Rae Fickle, Web Developer in PDX
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
malekabbes.com
Malek ABBES — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
arturkadykov.com
Artur K — Web Designer & Developer | Toronto, Canada
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
anastudioweb.com
Ana. — Web Designer & Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
72match
andynebs.com
Andrew Nebiosini — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andrewyancey.com
Andrew Yancey | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.