Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kimkellyauthor.com

Kim Kelly – Australian Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
paulaboer.com
Paula Boer – Australian Author & Nature Lover
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
terakelley.com
Tera Kelley – Author & Editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
askevelynarcher.com
Evelyn Archer – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
paulsorak.com
Paul Sorak – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
patriciaprijatel.com
Patricia Prijatel – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
paulkaplanauthor.com
Paul Kaplan Author – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
denisemahaneyauthor.com
Denise Mahaney – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
remelton.com
RE Melton – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
the-ogaras.com
Brendan & Lori O'Gara – Authors
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
andreapitzer.com
Andrea Pitzer – Author and Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
annahaines.net
Anna Haines – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
tessgalati.com
Tess Galati – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terripicone.com
Terri Picone – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
denelecampbell.com
denelecampbell – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
gonootropics.com
Fallon J Smith – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
kimcantin.com
Kim Cantin – Author & Speaker
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
kinseymaezing.com
Kinsey Maezing – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
reneeblarewrites.com
Renee Blare Christian Author – A Faithwalker’s Journey
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.