Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kimhodous.com

HOME - Kim Hodous · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
skillsource.com
Home - Skillsource
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
4dvelopment.com
Home - 4Dvelopment
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
68match
sirichilazi.com
Home - Siri Chilazi
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
68match
acertitude.biz
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
acertitude.me
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
acertitude.org
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
acertitudeexecutivesearch.com
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
acertitudeintegration.com
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
68match
6sentry.com
Home - 6sentry Search
2 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
impactingmindset.com
Home - Impacting Mindset
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
67match
albertchangspeaks.com
Home - Albert Chang Speaks
2 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
paydidconsulting.com
Home - Monica Maldonado
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
67match
situtu.com
Home - New Jetpack Site
2 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
lucasgroup.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - Lucas Executive
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
67match
bettertobehuman.com
Home - Better to Be Human
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
66match
360searchgroup.com
Home - The 360 Group
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
66match
desireepetrich.com
Home - Desiree Petrich
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
66match
2hundredk.com
Welcome - 2HundredK
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.