similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kimeperformance.com

Kime Performance Physical Therapy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

activephysicaltherapymi.com

Active Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

peakperformanceompt.com

Physical Therapy Dewitt MI | Peak Performance Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Ascend Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Global Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Nannen Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

acceleratephysicaltherapy.com

Accelerate Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

agilityptww.com

Agility Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Kinetic Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Kinport Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

restorativeptr.com

Restorative Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

In-Home Physical Therapy | IncePT

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Adept Physical Therapy, PC

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

accessphysicaltherapyllc.com

Access Physical Therapy, LLC

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Home | Be Well Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Home - Patriot Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

avantgardephysicaltherapy.com

Avant-Garde – Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Home | Desai Physical Therapy Inc

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

Global Doctor of Physical Therapy

2 shared topicsphysical-therapy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.