Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kimdonghee.dev

KIM DONGHEE PORTFOLIO | WELCOME · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
amisteelman.com
Ami Steelman's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
ananiacherkos.com
Welcome to My Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
aniketraut.com
Welcome to my Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
ettalbi.com
My Portfolio | ETTALBI OMAR
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
pavelvind.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
tfagan.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
devonwatkins.com
Portfolio | AI-Enhanced
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
kimruiheng.dev
Kim Rui's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
intelligent-automation.co.uk 🇬🇧
Welcome to my Portfolio and Blog | Notion
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
teranyx.com
TeraNyx Portfolio | BrandCaviar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
teraonyx.com
TeraNyx Portfolio | BrandCaviar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
albahri.org
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
alex-zc.me
portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
anoopkarnik.net
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
andreimuzarau.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
angieyoo.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
estercinelli.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
nastyakrouglova.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.