similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kimdevinebooks.com

Kim Devine – Author Information and Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

Ana Devise – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Peg Daniels – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Kim Magowan – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andrewdyhin.com

Andrew Dyhin – Author and innovator

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

biancasierra.com

Bianca Sierra – Author and Editor

2 shared topicsfiction

Kitty's Books – An Author and Her Books

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amrauthor Writer, Reader, and Bookish

2 shared topicsfiction

Amy Barry – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Eva K. More – author

2 shared topicsfiction

bethanjonesauthor.com

Bethan Jones – Author of historical fiction

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

paulagleeson.com

Paula Gleeson – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Renowrites – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Amita Basu – My fiction and book reviews

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kim Neville – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

paulwalkerauthor.com

Paul Walker – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Ana Brazil – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

chelseascottbooks.com

Chelsea Scott Books – Author Chelsea Scott

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Naeem Murr – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.