Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kimbumjun.com

KIM BUM JUN's - CodeSnippets · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
pauljamesportfolio.com
Paul James Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
nasreen.dev
Code Journal - Code Journal
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pebblecodes.com
Pebble Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
skinnercodes.com
Skinner Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
2bits.tech
2Bits - Thoughts & Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
goingundercoder.com
Home - CODE, LEARN, AND CODE
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
remziaknar.com
Remzi Aknar - Code & Creativity
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
reporecall.dev
RepoRecall - Get Back Into Your Own Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
reporecall.com
RepoRecall - Get Back Into Your Own Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
8bitscoding.io
8bit's coding
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
365git.com
365GIT - Code Every Day Challenge 2025
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ifnamemain.com
ifnamemain - where science meets software - tutorials, code-snippets, ideas and Python
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
malcolmcodes.com
Sup World. | Malcolm Codes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
simonkurbiel.com
SimonCodes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adrianperez.org
Mutant Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
amyknowscode.com
Amy Knows Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bestfewos.com
Rambling code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
peaceandcode.com
Peace & Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.