Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kimboykin.com

Kim Boykin Books | Author in Sedona · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
amyprokopis.com
Amy Prokopis | Author
3 shared topicsfiction
67match
chelseymortega.com
Chelsey M. Ortega | Author of magic and romance
3 shared topicsfiction
67match
annearmistead.com
Anne Armistead | Author of historical, romance, cozies
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
averymorgan.net
Avery Morgan | Author of Dark Romance, Thrillers & Fantasy
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
eveyoungauthor.com
Young Adult Book | Eve Young Author
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
gleewrites.com
Indie Author | Gleewrites
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
amyruttan.com
Home - Author Amy Ruttan
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
cheriedesues2.com
Main Author Page
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
demiwinters.com
Demi Winters, Romantasy Author
3 shared topicsfiction
66match
anacoqui.com
RomBkLove: Immersed in Books – Immersed in Books
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
annabellemccormack.com
Home » Annabelle McCormack, Author
3 shared topicsfiction
65match
patriciakay.com
Patricia Kay, USA Today Bestselling Author
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
angeladeles.com
Author | Angela Delés
3 shared topicsfiction
65match
nafsikabooks.com
Nafsika Books | Ghosted MD — Romantic Suspense & Paranormal Thriller
3 shared topicsfiction
64match
alaskafishingreservations.com
Dana Perino Books
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
aldarprojects.net
Dana Perino Books
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
7dayblogprofits.com
Dana Perino Books
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
360sistemasderecreacion.com
Dana Perino Books
3 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.