Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kiliman.dev

Kiliman’s Korner · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
aaron-scribbles.com
Aaron’s perspective
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kiendev.com
Kien's Corner
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adrake.org
adrake’s blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
sirjohnk.com
SirJohnK’s Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alastairs-place.net
Alastair’s Place
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alistairs-place.net
Alastair’s Place
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
siraben.dev
siraben’s musings | Writing proofs and programs.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
revinder.dev
Revinder’s Save States
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
naleid.com
Ted Naleid | Ted Naleid’s Notes
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
ilkerkorkut.com
İlker Korkut
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arh68.com
Alec’s blog | Alec’s infrequent blog.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
nacinocomputernetworks.com
Cyber Learning Corner - Alfredo Nacino JR
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
payette.io
payette.io | Nicolas Payette’s website
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
demontalembert.com
All posts | Roine
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
deriklima.com
Derik Lima's Page
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
dev-diaries.com
Dev Diaries | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
devexps.com
DevExps | DevExps
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
simonjbeaumont.com
Skylight Symmetry
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.