Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kieranegan.com

Kieran Egan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
sxuland.com
Shuran Xu
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
joshleeb.com
Joshleeb's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
santanembedded.com
SanTan Embedded
2 shared topicscomputing
61match
desiderantes.com
Desiderantes Blog – 🤷🏽
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
harmanholistix.com
Harman Holistix Ltd | systems perfomance with an eye on the big picture
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
hardwareteams.com
HardwareTeams.com - The #1 job board and blog for electrical and computer engineers. | HardwareTeams.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
crystaliball.com
Crystal i Ball
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
cryptonominom.com
Cryptonominom | Writings and thoughts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
crystal-reports-barcode.com
Native Barcode Generator for Crystal Reports
2 shared topicscomputing
60match
cryptoscythe.com
Cryptoscythe
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
crzy.dev
When everything goes South | Look South
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
csharpner.org
CSharpner.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
csharpner.net
CSharpner.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
csharp-xprt.com
Csharp-Xprt
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
csgenome.org
Home - CS Genome Project
2 shared topicscomputing
60match
csc-research.org
Alex Pothen
2 shared topicscomputing
60match
csauthors.org
Computer Scientists on the Internet
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
60match
csauthors.net
Computer Scientists on the Internet
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.