Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kierags.com

Chenwie Asang - Game Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
mandagame.dev
MandaGame - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
78match
goftis.com
Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
78match
rerwandi.com
Reynold Erwandi - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
aniltuluy.com
Anıl Tuluy | Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
ankuranant.dev
Ankur Anant - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
abdy.dev
Abdy | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
andy-pang.com
Andy Pang - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
retromite.com
Gregg Williams - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
reneabreu.dev
René Abreu — Sr. Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
achrafghazouani.tech
Achraf Ghazouani - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
andrewodom.net
Andrew Odom - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
renxikong.com
Indie Game Developer Portfolio & Projects | Kong Ren Xi
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
siyuan-xu.com
Siyuan Xu – Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
andreareverberi.com
Andrea Reverberi | Game Designer & Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
evbishop.dev
Unity Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
manouris.dev
Ioannis Manouris — Roblox Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
derekbaert.com
Derek Baert – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
adammorrell.dev
Adam Morrell - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.