Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to kiciot.com

Kiciot's Space · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
spacekitcat.com
SPACEKITCAT
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
spacecmdtech.com
Space Command
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
spacepyro.com
SpacePyro Labs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
spaceage.dev
Blog Posts | Space-Age Dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
spacecodecinema.com
Space Code Cinema
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
spacjer.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
piledev.com
I Read Some Code - A quiet space for good software.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
byte4cat.dev
Byte4Cat's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
somainer.com
Somainer's Site
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
sourcedennis.com
Dennis Sprokholt
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
deepcodeonline.com
Deep Code Online - Digital And Binary Space Continuum Of Michael Blanco
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
kastermist.com
Kaster Mist's Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rufflewind.com
Rufflewind's Scratchpad
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
notetoself.dev
Note to self – A developers thoughts, and a space to capture some useful knowledge.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
kekcheburec.com
Roman Samusevich (@kekcheburec)
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
noyaml.com
🚨🚨 That's a lot of YAML 🚨🚨
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
spaaleks.com
spaaleks (Aleksandar Spasojevic) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.