Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to khjames.com

KH James | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
annkyner.com
Ann Kyner | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
76match
pashaadam.com
Pasha Adam | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
slyokka.com
Sami Luokkanen | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
natetucker.com
@natetucker | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
thecalebreed.com
Caleb Reed | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
andromedandreams.com
Andromedan Dreams | Pawel | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
thebenjaminabbott.com
Random Writings | A Christopher | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
smchase.com
Midnight Miami by S. M. Chase | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
anoveldetour.com
A Novel Detour | Coleen | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
thebookpunk.com
Book Punk | Philip Elliott | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
paulkulpinski.com
Spawning Fish Tales | Paul Kulpinski | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
andersvane.com
An author's life | Vane | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
thebookthatatemylife.com
The Book That Ate My Life | Gary Glass | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
paulsherburne.com
Tales from Paul Sherburne | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
globalexclaimer.com
The Global Exclaimer | Mark Connolly | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
thechatner.com
The Chatner | Daniel Lavery | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
paskapomo.com
Paskan pomon pelikirja | Juho Salmi | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
angelicathorne.com
Angelica Thorne | 1980s Fiction, Books & Belonging | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.