Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to khartka.com

Klaudia's portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
imnoman.com
Noman's Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
denistita.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
gmeran.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
gmorubio.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
rheyoh.com
Rheyoh Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
nasimhossain.com
Nasim - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
0xoffsec.com
Portfolio App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
adhrin.dev
Adhrin - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
3urobeat.com
3urobeat - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
rexpark.com
Rex Park - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
singhapps.com
• Atul | PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
aghyad.dev
Aghyad – Apps Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
rentionsoftware.com
Rention - App Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
narea.dev
Wilson Narea | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
riadsafowan.com
Riad Safowan - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
akanshsirohi.dev
Akansh Sirohi | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
ikamlesh.com
Kamlesh Patel | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
manaydivatia.com
Manay Divatia | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.