Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to khalilli.ai

0x10011 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
derekcroote.com
Derek Croote | Perspectives on science, technology, and engineering.
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
sirin.dev
Sirin's Note
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
bettercallshao.com
Better Call Shao
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
textonic.io
Textonic
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
marcsegond.com
Dr. Marc Segond's Web Page | Marc Segond researcher and R&D engineer in computer science
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andrewhsu.me
About | Andrew Hsu
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
manikfernando.com
Manik Fernando
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
bethina.dev
Shyam Sai Bethina | Software Engineer & AI Researcher
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
nathanielviana.com
Nathaniel | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
remodmedia.com
Remod Media
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
markstanl.com
Mark Stanley | SWE
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
nalduaij.com
About - Naser AlDuaij
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
derekpastor.com
Derek Pastor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
paulheymann.com
Paul Heymann
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
akshaypeshave.me
Akshay Peshave
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
adhyyankumar.com
Adhyyan Kumar | AI + Full-Stack Product Builder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dennisivy.com
Dennis Ivy - About Me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexandrecortyl.com
Alexandre Cortyl
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.