Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kgarner.com

Home — Keith T. Garner · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
deusmaxus.com
Home — deusmaxus
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
devopsteddy.com
Home — Teddy Kalp
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
1stvamp.org
Home — 1stvamp.org
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
chase-williams.com
Home — Chase Williams
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
abhisheksaha.dev
Home — Abhishek Saha
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
iliyan.dev
Home — Iliyan Jivraj
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
devopstoai.com
Home • Mike Stankavich
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
1st-technologies.com
Home — 1st Technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ashleyparks.dev
Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sina-motahari.com
Home - My CMS
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
dferrersan.com
Home • Diego Ferrer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
khushbajwa.com
Khush Bajwa
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
gocodemode.com
Gregory Monroe — Resume
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andy-roberts.net
Homepage | andy-roberts.net
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ethomasjoseph.com
Home - Thomas Joseph
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
naeemgitonga.com
Home | Naeem Gitonga
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arztpraxis.io
home - philip trauner
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
alexgutierrez.tech
Alex Gutierrez — Software Engineer & Engineering Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.