Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to keyvanfatehi.com

Keyvan's Notes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
natecornell.com
Nate's Notes
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
nanukadba.com
Nanuka DBA Notes
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
kiransabne.dev
Kiran Sabne — Engineering Notes
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
desertdba.com
The Desert DBA – SQL Server Field Notes by Jeff Iannucci
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
good-data.co.uk 🇬🇧
Good Data | Notion
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
evacdm.com
Codatum - Collaborative data notebook unlocks the potential of data
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
gokurationai.com
Kuration — Your Data Edge, Built Not Rented
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
ihatethissite.com
iHateThisSite.com – I hate this site, ah not really.
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
camblab.co.uk 🇬🇧
Camblab - The Camlab Blog and Information Database Camlab
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
camblab.uk 🇬🇧
Camblab - The Camlab Blog and Information Database Camlab
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
acervo.org
Acervo: Item-level description at scale
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
achfrag.net
Jan’s website and blog | Jan’s blog on big data, databases, and distributed systems
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
activityschema.io
Activity Schema
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
activityschema.net
Activity Schema
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
akshaysakpal.com
Akshay Sakpal — Data Analyst · Dublin, Ireland
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
akumuli.org
Akumuli
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
alanshilepsky.com
Alan Shilepsky Consulting LLC--Home
1 shared topicsdatabases
60match
aldl.dev
Adriano Baviera — Data Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.