Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to kelaya.com

Kelaya | Cosmética Profesional para el Cuidado de la Piel · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
50match
cosme.com.co 🇨🇴
Cosme | COSME
4 co-citations2 shared categoryskin-care
49match
elvaestetica.com
Centro estética y bienestar en Valencia: Elva Estética
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
47match
cristina-galmiche.com
Centros de estética Cristina Galmiche
3 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryskin-care
45match
cinthialashes.com
CinthiaLashes - Lashista Profesional en Loíza
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorybeauty
43match
cremascosmeticos.com
Cremas
3 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
42match
mylesteticaavanzada.com
MyL Estética Avanzada | Belleza, bienestar y cuidado personal
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
42match
gabymasin.com
Gaby Masin – Productos de Estética
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
41match
bysansi.com
LA BELLEZA NO SÓLO SE VE, LA BELLEZA SE SIENTE. | Pionera en el cuidado de la piel de lujo, catalana de nacimiento y madrileña por elección hace 20 años no pude
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categoryskin-care
41match
lamdors.com
Estética profesional - Cosmecéuticos Lamdors
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
41match
crisespaidebellesa.com
Cristina Pérez, Espai de bellesa
2 co-citations5 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
41match
dizdiraestetica.com
Dizdira Estética | Centro de Estética en Basauri
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty
41match
beautyderm.co 🇨🇴
Beautyderm – Tienda de la piel – Tienda de la piel
3 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorybeauty

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.