Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to keijzer.dev

Keijzer DEV · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
abendevelopment.nl 🇳🇱
Aben Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
bedrockdevelopment.nl 🇳🇱
Bedrock Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
bedrockdev.nl 🇳🇱
Bedrock Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
baselab.nl 🇳🇱
Baselab - Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
itsjoey.dev
itsjoey.dev - Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
itonrails.com
IT on Rails: Agile development
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
monadius.com
Home - Monadius Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
athereal.nl 🇳🇱
Anton Kritikos | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
koolenorganisatie.com
Helder — Website in voorbereiding
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
bluecliff.nl 🇳🇱
Blue Cliff Concepts Web Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
oever-loos.com
OEVERLOOS – Creative Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
allesvoordecode.nl 🇳🇱
Alles voor de Code - Jorg van Rossem
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
kommotiv.dev
Webdesign - PHP ontwikkeling - Deventer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
a2solutions.nl 🇳🇱
A² Solutions, Custom Web App Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
apps2build.nl 🇳🇱
Apps2build – Developing with passion
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
belastingaangifte-loket.nl 🇳🇱
Ziel ICT Services – Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
modul8.com
MODUL8.com – web developer since 1995
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
accurity.nl 🇳🇱
Robin Mohr | Laravel & PHP Backend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.