Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to keepescoding.com

Jackson Keepes - Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
congq.com
Q Cong - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
dillankerai.com
Dillan Kerai - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
lxkota.com
Jack Coleman - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
aniali.dev
Anish Ali - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
andystitt.com
Andy Stitt - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
gauravlad.com
Gaurav Lad - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
itugui.com
Ioan Tugui - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
ivanluna.dev
Iván Luna - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
andythelam.com
Andy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
anthonysuh.com
Anthony Suh - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
calebdeerr.com
Caleb Deerr - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
nuuson.com
Nicholas Wilson - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
anilozmen.com
Anıl Özmen - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
antonyperez.com
Antony Perez - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
anupaperera112.com
Anupa Perera - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
aremu.dev
Victor Aremu - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
arthurviana.com
Arthur Viana - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
swaggerstudios.com
Travis Libby - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.