Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to katoengineer.com

Kato - Data Architect · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
dataarchitects.co.uk 🇬🇧
Data Architects
1 shared topicsdatabases
75match
data-archive.ac.uk 🇬🇧
UK Data Archive
1 shared topicsdatabases
72match
portfoliosoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Data Modelling and Data Architecture Consultancy
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
bigdatacompany.co.uk 🇬🇧
BigData Company | Enterprise Data Architecture & High-Performance Web Development
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
gauthamyerramareddy.com
Gautham Yerramareddy - Data Analytics Engineer
1 shared topicsdatabases
68match
ethicaldatadesign.com
Ethical Data Design — Embedding Ethics at the Architectural Level
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
isd-data.com
ABG DATA API
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
ankhor.com
ANKHOR FlowSheet - Data Workbench
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
momensaleh.com
Moamen Saleh Anwer | Data Analyst Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
madinagafarova.com
Madina Gafarova | Data Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
swiftcoanalytics.com
SwiftCo Analytics - Data Analytics Solutions | Trinidad and Tobago
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
dataanalise.com.br 🇧🇷
Data Analise
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
datalika.co.uk 🇬🇧
Datalika - Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
annoml.com
ANNOML - Data with reason.
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
researchdatalabs.com
Research Data Labs
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
gbidata.com
GBI Data
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
etlfunnel.com
Code-Driven Data Pipelines
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
madata.io
madata.io - Data curation done right
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.