Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to katethechemist.com

Kate the Chemist - Science Entertainer, Author & Professor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
oxscience.com
OxScience – Learn Science: Chemistry, Biology & Physics Explained
1 shared topicsscience
67match
lullrb.com
Robert B. Lull, Ph.D. — Science Communication Scholar & Author
1 shared topicsscience
67match
munkeatlooi.com
Mun Keat Looi – Science writer, editor, professional nerd
1 shared topicsscience
67match
abouchon.com
Axel Bouchon — Neuroscientist, Author & Entrepreneur
1 shared topicsscience
67match
academysciencecenter.com
ACADEMY SCIENCE CENTER - Home
1 shared topicsscience
66match
adventuresci.org
Home | Adventure Science Center
1 shared topicsscience
66match
atasciencecouncil.com
ATA Science Council - Home
1 shared topicsscience
66match
mruchime.com
Uchime Sciences - Science For All
1 shared topicsscience
66match
analyticalsciencenetwork.co.uk 🇬🇧
ASN | The Analytical Science Network
1 shared topicsscience
66match
123science.com
123 Science
1 shared topicsscience
66match
acceleratingscience.com
Accelerating Science Blog | Thermo Fisher Scientific
1 shared topicsscience
66match
100topscience.com
100 Top Science Sites
1 shared topicsscience
66match
100topsciencesites.com
100 Top Science Sites
1 shared topicsscience
66match
sciencenetwork.uk 🇬🇧
UCCF Science Network
1 shared topicsscience
66match
crazyacesciencelab.com
Crazy Ace Science Lab
1 shared topicsscience
66match
funscienceclub.com
Fun Science Club
1 shared topicsscience
66match
mrdanic.com
Mr Danic | Science lessons
1 shared topicsscience
66match
terrescience.com
Join Us on the Terrescience Podcast | TerreScience
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.