Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kateevansdesign.com

Kate Evans | Digital Product Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
alex-andrea.io
Alex Andrea | Digital Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
aaronct.me
Aaron C-T — Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
lucyahooper.com
Lucy Hooper | Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
juliafogelberg.com
Jules – Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
eightidea.com
8th Idea - Digital Product Design & Branding Agency
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
adamborthwick.com
Adam Borthwick - Digital Product Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
75match
junyi-ding.com
Junyi Ding Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
bucklemeshoe.com
Jared Buckley - Product Designer, Entrepreneur & Digital Explorer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
julionyc.com
Julio Pezua - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
caidavies.me
Cai Davies - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
sipilov.com
Ivan Sipilov | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
juliajoonakim.com
Julia Kim — Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
brunocapani.com
Bruno Capani // Principal Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
accportfolio.com
ACC Portfolio - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
simonsebjanic.com
Simon Sebjanic | Senior UI/UX Designer & Digital Product Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
theahao.com
Thea Hao - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
asherterpstra.com
Asher Terpstra | Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
builtbylaura.com
Portfolio — Principal Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.