Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kateanders.com

Kate Anders - Romantic Suspense Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
susansleeman.com
Romantic Suspense Author Susan Sleeman
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
callistolux.com
Callisto Lux – Dark Romantasy Author
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
angelicahastings.com
Home - Angelica Hastings - Suspense Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
suramesh.com
S.U. Ramesh - Indie Author
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
iwanttodoyogatoo.com
Carole P. Roman | Children's Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
anitamareebooks.com
Anita Maree Books: Mystery Suspense, Humour and, Romantic Comedy | Betty Raven Books
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
lyssalund.com
Lyssa Lund - Fantasy, Romance and Cosy Mystery Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
annbakshisauthor.com
Ann Bakshis – Author – Indie Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
beatabudrys.com
Beata Budrys | Debut Romantasy Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
consueloroland.com
Consuelo Roland | Literary Suspense to Haunt the Heart
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
hectormillerbooks.com
Hector Miller Books – Author page
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
islafinch.com
Isla Finch – Author, Contemporary Romance
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
lyndajcox.com
LYNDA J. COX, WESTERN HISTORICAL ROMANCE AUTHOR - Lynda J Cox Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
anniesolomon.com
Annie Solomon - Romantic Suspense Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
lyfaulk.com
Ly Faulk – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
anneolleauthor.com
Anne Olle | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
anneboothauthor.com
Anne Booth – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
helengoltz.com
Helen Goltz – Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.