similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kasiamurphy.com

Kasiamurphy alternatives & similar sites

Kasia Murphy — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
evamurphyryan.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Eva Murphy Ryan	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hellofergo.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	hellofergo.com \| Design leadership, strategy and coaching	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kccouragecoaching.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	KC Courage Coaching	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annfischer.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ann Fischer – Executive Coaching & Leadership Development	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danibcook.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dani Brecher Cook – Teaching, Leadership & Libraries	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bubworks.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Carissa Bub - Leadership Advisor & Coach \| The Art of Connection	en	executive-leadership-and-management Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keithrmoon.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Keith R. Moon – Leadership in Action	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desiredeffectsld.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Desired Effects Leadership Development	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antonybell.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Antony Bell \| Antony Bell	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
himresearch.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	HIM Research	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
easytofollowleadership.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Brian Reisman - Speaking and Writing on Leading and Following	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
visialeadership.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Visia Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kelly-kim.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kelly-Kim	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howleadershipactuallyworks.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	How Leadership Actually Works	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keithmateri.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Keith Materi \| Precision Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenithomas.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Keni Thomas – Motivational Speaker, Extraordinary Storyteller	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3daylc.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	3 Day Leadership Challenge	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danmarbes.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dan Marbes \| Thoughts on leadership and other random musings	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.