Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to karinka.dev

Karin Domagalska - Game Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
reyesportfolio.com
Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
aniltuluy.com
Anıl Tuluy | Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
aanyaxp.dev
AG | Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
ankuranant.dev
Ankur Anant - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
andreareverberi.com
Andrea Reverberi | Game Designer & Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
batukemiksiz.com
Batu Kemiksiz - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
dogus.dev
Doğuş Bilgilier – Unity Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
retromite.com
Gregg Williams - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
henano.com
Henano, Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
helloryano.com
Ryan Owsinski - Game Design & Development Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
pixelvoices.com
Pixel Voices - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
nurullahtutal.com
Nurullah Tutal | Game Developer & Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
etem-enes.com
Enes Etem - Game Developer Portfolio | Level Designer & Gameplay Programmer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
oguzkonya.com
oguzkonya | Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
andy-pang.com
Andy Pang - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
sviolier.com
Sebastien Violier - Game developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
andrewduit.com
Andrew Duit - Full Stack Developer | Game Designer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
adamknapecz.com
Ádám Knapecz – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.