Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kaogeek.dev

Kao.Geek · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
redite.dev
Redite · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
jsiegel.dev
Lioness100 · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
aterra.dev
AterraEngine · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
eigenpaul.com
eigenpaul (paul) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andrewlmartin.dev
AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
busysloths.org
Busy Sloths Community · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
owdevel.com
owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
jsilvaiot.com
vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
simonczech.com
sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bugbakery.org
The Vegan Bug Bakery · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
asm.im
Soulghost (Sou1gh0st) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
brunomikoski.com
brunomikoski (Bruno Mikoski) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
adag.io
rpetrich (Ryan Petrich) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
jroschmidt.com
jros92 (Jörg Schmidt) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
simon-mo.com
simon-mo (Simon Mo) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
achiu.me
idno0001 (Anthony Chiu) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alchemyst.dev
Alchemyst0x (Alchemyst) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
alexf0x.dev
alexf0xdev (alexf0xdev) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.