Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kalhanawi.dev

Khaldoun Alhanawi – Software engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
abroro.com
abroro - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
abdullahamin.dev
Muhammad Abdullah Amin - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
corrinasivak.com
Corrina Sivak – Software Engineer👩‍💻
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
papierowski.com
Software Engineer | Michał Papierowski
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
juanjorequena.com
Juanjo Requena | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
lugora.com
AboutMe | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
louissavoie.com
Louis Savoie - Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
luke-schreiber.com
Luke Schreiber - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahmedmahmoud.dev
Ahmed Mahmoud – Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
luiray.com
Ray Lui | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aakashpai.dev
Aakash Pai — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aaronpetcoff.me
Aaron Petcoff, software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
eddarmitage.com
Edd Armitage - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
lucaraveri.com
Luca Raveri - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andymbridges.com
Andy Bridges | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
panji.dev
Panji Asniar | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
mrcelino.dev
Marcel | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.