Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kai-kash.com

Kai Kash - Senior UX Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
burstingattheseams.com
Tim Shannon | Senior UX/Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
alexmera.net
Alex Mera - Senior Visual Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
ani-mccurnin.com
Ani McCurnin - Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
ashlyncassity.com
Ashlyn Cassity | Senior UX Designer & Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
lucietran.com
Lucie Tran | Senior Brand & UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
akproductdesign.com
Allison Kuehn - Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
creative-honey.com
Cale Honneysett // Senior UI/UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
ashishkhoshya.com
Ashish Khoshya — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
rebekahirizarry.com
Rebekah Irizarry — UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
mrahmadusama.com
Ahmad Usama | UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
eileentong.com
Eileen - Senior Product Designer Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
luchoaranceta.com
Lucho Aranceta — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
luanbr.com
Luan — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
loridyer.com
Lori Dyer — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
msendan.com
Senior Visual Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
jsandrieu.com
Jules Andrieu - Senior Creative Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
palmeranna.com
Anna Palmér | UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
courtneyeisenhuth.com
Courtney Eisenhuth — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.