similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kafaoglu.de

Kafaoglu alternatives & similar sites

Ömer K. Kafaoglu - Mendix Expert & MVP | Low-Code Development Consultant — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jannekeipert.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Janne Keipert - Software Developer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
intob.app ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Research and Product Development - INTOB	de	technology-and-computing Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jkrech.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Senior Software Consultant - Jacqueline Krech	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
j4velin.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	j4velin.development	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
isc-da.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Intelligent Solutions Consulting Roland Stephan – Intelligent Solutions Consulting	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aechoone.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	AechoOne - Developer Portfolio	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jakob-laemmle.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Jakob Lämmle \| Developer \| Light Operator \| Creator \| Allrounder	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakoblaemmle.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Jakob Lämmle \| Developer \| Light Operator \| Creator \| Allrounder	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johannesschoening.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Johannes Schöning – Professor of Computer Science \| Speaker \| Consultant	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jojendersie.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Developerblog – Johannes Jendersie \| Content Generators & Demos	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joerghoh.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	About Jörg – Things on a content management system	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algominds.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AlgoMinds	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
itaufsohr.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Events, Neuigkeiten und Expertenwissen aus der IT-Welt	Germany de	technology-and-computing TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
justhackit.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Kossi D. T. Saka \| kdts.io	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aerwatch.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Deine Digitalexperten aus Nürnberg \| CodeCamp:N	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jannkleen.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Jann Kleen — Software Engineer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jkoeber.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Johannes Köber \| Digital Native, Senior Developer, Spring Boot, JEE, JakartaEE, Fullstack Developer	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jastram.de ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Michael Jastram – Systems Enginering Expert	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.