similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to kadrianbarron.com

K Adrian Barron – Prospective Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

adrianstumpp.com

Adrian Stumpp | Author

2 shared topicsfiction

J.R. Hebden – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Lori Lipsky – Perspective with a Point

2 shared topicsfiction

bwarrenbrown.com

B. Warren Brown – Thriller Author

2 shared topicsfiction

abigailjohnsonbooks.com

Abigail Johnson – YA Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Julia Boon – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

julieandersonwriter.com

Julie Anderson – Writer and author

2 shared topicsfiction

Julia Satu – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

byralphcalderon.com

Ralph Calderon — Author

2 shared topicsfiction

corrinedalton.com

Corrine Dalton – Indie Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

jtorresauthor.com

J. Torres – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

J.T. Grobler – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

julietomlinsonauthor.com

Julie Tomlinson | Author of 365 Days of Becoming | Introspective Fiction

2 shared topicsfiction

Terri Nolan – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

rebeccaphelpsauthor.com

Rebecca Phelps – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

rebeccadengate.com

Rebecca Dengate – Speculative fiction author

2 shared topicsfiction

juliopinera.com

Julio Pinera – American Author

2 shared topicsfiction

courtneyehanlon.com

Courtney E. Hanlon – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.