Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kabakel.com

Kate Kelly Sound Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
junianasounddesign.com
Juniana Sound Design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
73match
echosounddesign.com
echo sound design.com
1 shared topicsaudio-production
71match
silverbulletsoundlab.com
Ryan Logan - Sound Designer
1 shared topicsaudio-production
71match
thebionicearaudio.com
Sound Design, Sound Systems
1 shared topicsaudio-production
71match
judewadesounddesign.com
Jude Wade — Sound Designer
1 shared topicsaudio-production
71match
lsdav.com
Home | Landry's Sound Design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
71match
jukkanurmela.com
Jukka Nurmela - Sound Designer
1 shared topicsaudio-production
71match
simonpanayi.com
Simon Panayi // Sound Designer
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
36sound.com
36Sound | Score and Sound Design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
lorenzodanesin.com
Lorenzo Danesin - Sound Designer
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
home-k1.com
home k one - music & sound design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
alexandreschnepf.com
Alexandre Schnepf – Sound Design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
4bitstudio.com
4Bit Studio - Music & Sound Design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
audibly.com
AUDIBLY sound reinforcement design
1 shared topicsaudio-production
70match
burningeyecreative.com
BURNING EYE CREATIVE | SOUND DESIGN
1 shared topicsaudio-production
69match
andrewkantos.com
Andrew Kantos | Expert Sound Designer
1 shared topicsaudio-production
69match
eidsonsound.com
Eidson Sound | Sound Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsaudio-production
69match
lpaudiolab.com
LPAudioLab :: Composition | Sound Design
1 shared topicsaudio-production

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.