Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to kaankarakeben.com

Kaan Karakeben · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
hmzdot.com
Hamza Karabağ
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
silvankuebler.com
Silvan Kübler
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alankent.me
Alan Kent's Blog | Occasional personal opinions on things
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
futuremeetsit.com
Home | Future meets IT
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
justinivins.com
Justin Ivins' Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
100lewis.com
Home | Tyler Lewis
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
fuertes.app
Adrian Fuertes
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
jsteinb.com
Jordan Steinberg
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonavila.com
Simon Avila
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
burakoz.info
Burak Öz
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
alecstashevsky.com
Alec Stashevsky
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
siegera.com
Siegera — Siegfreid Bugarin
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
abdulrafayzahid.dev
Abdul Rafay's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
juanmackie.com
Juan Mackie — Builder, Writer & Systems Thinker
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
lukashanes.com
Lukas Hanes | Articles
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
albertabedi.dev
Albert Abedi | Product + Engineering
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
albertabedi.io
Albert Abedi | Product + Engineering
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
alencar.tech
Home | Alencar Tech
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.