Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to k-edward.com

Ken - Designer / Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
ozrenkosi.com
Ozren Kosi | Designer and developer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
alexandernicholas.me
Alexander Nicholas - Product Designer & Developer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
achmadbaraja.com
Achmad Baraja | Product Designer and Developer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
lorenzobruno.com
Lorenzo Bruno | Product Designer & Developer | London
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
simongardinier.com
Simon Gardinier – Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
simhadigital.com
DENIS SIMHA - Product Designer and No-code Developer Pordtolio
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
terriyeelee.com
Terri Yee Lee - Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
abrekov4u.com
Dima Abrekov - Digital Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
agneay.tech
Agneay B Nair | Creative Developer & Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
signexxja.com
Home - Signexx Design & Development
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
hofydesign.com
Graphic Designer | Hofy
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
andrewbarchuk.com
Andrew Barchuk — Creative Developer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
lonnychu.com
Your Name - UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
pablomartinezdiaz.com
Pablo Salvador Martinez Diaz
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
andyhuntdesigns.com
Andy Hunt - Design / Illustration / Web Development
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
acceleratesuite.digital
Accelerate Suite — UI/UX Design for Developers
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
egeveyisoglu.com
EV - Software Developer & Visual Communication Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
loriwashbon.com
Lori Washbon, Creative Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.