Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jwrose.com

JWRose – Just another author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
ebsary.com
Sunny Ebsary – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
pamvercoe.com
Pam Vercoe – Artist Poet Author
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
justineormeauthor.com
The Author – Justine's scribbles and her (sometimes) strange ideas.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
atrainach.com
A.T. Rainach, Author – Author
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
terrancemillet.com
Terrance Lane Millet – Author
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
tessachenoa.com
tessachenoa.com – author site
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
terraduncan.com
Terra Duncan – Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
jrlyle.com
JRLyle, Author
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
alexlangston.com
A. M. Langston – Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
adelynsamazingadventures.com
Abigail Elizabeth Black – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
paigewalkerauthor.com
Paige Walker – -Author
2 shared topicspoetry
65match
rebekahrholley.com
Rebekah R Holley – Author Webpage
2 shared topicspoetry
64match
julianstannardauthor.com
Julian Stannard – Author, Poet, Academic
2 shared topicspoetry
64match
pamelaueckerman.com
Pamela Ueckerman – Children's Author & Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
effiegraves.com
Effie Graves – YA Contemporary Author and Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
64match
alanjwrightauthorpoet.com
Alan j Wright Author Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
julieasellers.com
Julie A. Sellers | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
just-a-dear.com
Just A Dear – Pamela McGee Wilkinson
2 shared topicspoetry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.