similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to justjess.com

justjess (Jessica D'Amico) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

simon-mo (Simon Mo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

abraham (Abraham Williams) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Redite · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Alchemyst0x (Alchemyst) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jeanrodrigop (Jean Rodrigo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Lioness100 · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

vankxr (João Silva) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

simonsoriano.com

simon0191 (Simon Soriano) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewlmartin.dev

AndrewR3K (Andrew) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

ludorl82 (Ludovic Lamarre) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

michaelsabo (Michael Sabo) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

owdevel (Owen Mak) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

AterraEngine · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

JuanjoFR (Juanjo Fernández) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jvandort (Justin Van Dort) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

luiznux (Luiz Tagliaferro) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

jros92 (Jörg Schmidt) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

sczech (Simon Czech) · GitHub

1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.