Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to justingeagan.com

Justin Geagan | PASSIONATE ABOUT THE USER-CENTERED DESIGN PROCESS · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
hitroveiamdan.com
Design Engineer Dan
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
loonohod1.com
Zoya Smirnova, Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
alexandrabrown.me
Alex Brown - Senior Product Designer | Contra
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
juandavidfigueroa.com
Juan David Figueroa — Staff Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
brunorocha.com
Bruno Rocha - Senior Product Designer - Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
alexandrasvenssonportfolio.com
My Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
alextaylorsmith.com
alextaylorsmith
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
court-ortiz.com
Courtney Ortiz Courtney Ortiz
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
singhanusha.com
My Framer Site
2 shared topicsdesign
38match
efratkost.com
Efrat Kost User Centered Design
1 shared topicsdesign
37match
atd-aboutthedesign.com
ATD-About The Design -
1 shared topicsdesign
36match
sierraskorupski.com
Sierra Skorupski | Human-Centered Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
36match
buildwithconnective.org
Build With Us - Human-Centered Design Research by Connective
1 shared topicsdesign
36match
bydustinwang.com
dustin wang | product design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
36match
ozzieherrera.com
Ozzie Herrera – Los Angeles based design professional
1 shared topicsdesign
35match
byscotty.com
scott yu-jan | product design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
35match
aboutdesignmagazine.com
About Design Magazine
1 shared topicsdesign
35match
acsquareddesign.com
AC Squared Design LLC
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.