Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jurando.com

Jurando | Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
testersuite.com
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
testersweet.com
Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
adiplus.nl 🇳🇱
ADI+ Solutions - Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
advisorsoftware.nl 🇳🇱
Homepage
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
actendo.com
Actendo | Dé Specialist in Softwarelicenties
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
aandeslagmetexcelvba.nl 🇳🇱
Aan de slag met Excel VBA - Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
textadjust.com
TextAanpassen
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
4webcom.com
Home | 4Webcom
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
kabelberekening.com
Home - Kabel++
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
airoc.nl 🇳🇱
Home — Airoc
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
4webcom.nl 🇳🇱
Home | 4Webcom
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
efice.com
Homepage - EFICE
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
aanbesteden.ai
Home | Chockablock
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
adobeusergroup.nl 🇳🇱
Home - Adobe user group
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
hitapp.com
Home - Apptimize Platform
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
juumo.io
Juumo | Software voor vastgoedbeheer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
2discover.nl 🇳🇱
Tourio | software voor interactieve tours
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
atriplus.com
Bluon – Maatwerk Software Studio | Custom Software Studio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.