Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to junoux.com

Juno UX Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
achudesign.com
achu design
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
buikus.com
Buikus - Digital product designer
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
builtbydesign.io
Built By Design
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
hithahere.com
Hitha R - Product designer
1 shared topicsstartups
67match
brunoscheufler.com
Bruno Scheufler
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
astrovinh.com
Astrovinh - Founding designer
1 shared topicsstartups
66match
simontran.com
Simon Tran – Product Design Leader
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
eclotodesigns.com
EclotoDesigns — Venture Studio
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
futuryze.com
Futuryze Digital - A Studio Designed For Tech Startups
1 shared topicsstartups
65match
3zerofive.com
3ZEROFIVE – Design Studio – USA
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
attopartners.com
Atto Partners - strategic design and development
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
crameroffice.com
Founder-grade design for company-defining moments
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
agiletalks.org
Agile Talks - Startups, Product and Software development
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
thebadbro.com
Your Startup Design - Product design partner for startups & products
1 shared topicsstartups
64match
brunolichot.com
Bruno Lichot
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
adlk.io
Stefan Malzner — Product designer & founder of Franz
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
protopilot.co.uk 🇬🇧
ProtoPilot - The interaction design and prototyping experts
1 shared topicsstartups
63match
thebehavioralstartup.com
The Behavioral Startup: A Behavioral Design Methodology That Everyone Can Apply
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.