Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to junkejiang.com

Junke Jiang | Computational Materials Scientist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
sierkalab.com
Computational Materials Science Group | Computational Materials Science
2 shared topicsphysics
70match
alexfreeman.org
Alex Freeman: My Journey in Materials Science
2 shared topicsscience
69match
astrocass.com
Dr. Cassandra Hall – Assistant Professor of Computational Astrophysics
2 shared topicsscience
69match
msestudent.com
Materials Science & Engineering – Taking you from student to professional in the field of materials science
2 shared topicsphysics
68match
asmejcnd.org
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS - Home
2 shared topicsphysics
68match
lucianindustries.com
Lucian Industries | Energy · Materials · Space · Computing
2 shared topicsphysics
68match
album-of-cfm.com
An album of computational fluid motion
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
2dmater.com
2D Semiconductors - Advanced Quantum Materials
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
coulaislab.com
Corentin Coulais – Machine Materials Lab
2 shared topicsscience
67match
calcweb.net
Calculator for Scientists
2 shared topicsphysics
67match
lowdeg.com
Low-Dimensional Electronics Group – Engineering materials with atomic dimensions for new device applications
2 shared topicsscience
66match
acsmotion.com
ACS Scientific
2 shared topicsscience
66match
alaskit.net
AlasKit - Educational & Scientific Resources
2 shared topicsscience
66match
atqupolis.com
HOME | Science Blog | Quantum Computing | Classical Algorithms | @Qupolis
2 shared topicsphysics
66match
ms2mlab.com
MS2M Lab – Mechanics of Smart and Soft Materials
2 shared topicsscience
65match
terranova-sciences.com
Scientific Research Consulting | Terra Nova Sciences LLC
2 shared topicsscience
65match
paigequarterman.com
Paige Quarterman — Experimental Materials Physicist
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
fusionexcelqs.com
Home | Fusion Excel International Quantum Science
2 shared topicsphysics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.