Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to junilliilli.com

Junilliilli devNote · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
byteworks.blog
Byteworks
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
4amics.com
Xavier Perez Blog - LAMP blog for PHP&MySQL developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
judsonwhite.com
Judson White
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
juliegems.com
Codewhirl.com
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
remarkablecoder.com
Remarkable Coder – Everything you need to know about code development
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anothercat.me
AnotherCat - Dev
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
muhamadfarihan.com
Muhamad Farihan | C#, ASP.NET and Angular Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
luaonbeans.com
Lua on Beans - The Micro MVC Framework
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pacey6.com
Pacey Lau
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
reihanian.com
Iman Reihanian ─ developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
thaske.com
thaske/
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexmp.dev
Alexander MP
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
kaanbilgili.com
Kaan Bilgili — Junior Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
simproch.dev
Simon Prochazka | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexanderwang.dev
Alexander Wang | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
brunogdias.com
Bruno G. Dias
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.