Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to junhaochai.com

Jun Hao Chai · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
justinmae.com
Justin Mae | Building AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
1pitaph.com
1pitaph portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
bryangustavoparedes.com
Bryan Gustavo Paredes | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
hishamahmer.com
Hisham Ahmer — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
eddiecohanim.com
Eddie Cohanim
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
anoopkarnik.net
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
theanuragaggarwal.com
Anurag Aggarwal - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
paciosoft.com
paciosoft - portfolio | My personal portfolio and blog
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
alexchariton.dev
Alexandros Chariton | Full-Stack AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
ebiemsam.com
EBIE M SAM - Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
atamoguz.com
Atam Oguz Erkara | Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
alejandro-heras-espinosa.com
Alejandro Heras Espinosa - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
brunochagas.com
Bruno Chagas
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
eeshanhasan.com
Eeshan Hasan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
theaichain.com
The AI Chain
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
adikuma.com
Aditya Kumar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
asykim.com
Andrew Sy Kim
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
tfagan.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.