Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to jungworks.com

JungWorks – A Creative Place · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
thecreativepanic.com
The Creative Panic
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
mozaikink.com
Mozaik Ink – creative writing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
cosucoe.com
Cosucoe.com – Creative.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
creativereviewer.com
Home | The Creative Reviewer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
the-senses.com
The Senses — Creative Bible
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
creative-novelist.com
Creative Novelist
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
3dreamscreativeenterprises.com
3 Dreams Creative Enterprises
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
3dreamscreative.com
3 Dreams Creative Enterprises
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
creativedhaka.com
Creative Dhaka
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
creativelsj.com
Front Page - CreativeLSJ
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
louiseross.com
Louise Ross – Creative Writing Portfolio
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
mrbookandme.com
Mr Book And Me – Creative book series
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
recordedfiction.com
Your Creative Writing Blog for Stories & Tips
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
creatingobscurablog.com
Creating Obscura | creative writing blog
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
creativitydip.com
Creativity Dip
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
paracreative.com
Paracreative
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
losttheplotcreative.com
Lost The Plot Creative – Have you Lost the Plot?
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
jtorresauthor.com
J. Torres – Author
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.